Labor NSW; Ex Labor MP Angela D’Amore loses appeal against corruption finding.

From The ABC Online May 14, 2012

Former state Labor MP Angela D’Amore has lost her court case against the New South Wales corruption watchdog.

In 2010, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) found the former member for Drummoyne engaged in corrupt conduct by misusing $4500 in staff entitlements.

Her parliamentary secretary roles sere taken away and she was banned from standing as a candidate in the 2011 New South Wales election. No charges were laid.

But Ms D’Amore denied acting dishonestly when she claimed sitting day relief payments for part-time staffers Agatha La Manna and Karen Harbilas, in 2006 and 2007.

In an appeal, her lawyers argued that the ICAC based its findings of corrupt conduct on ”grossly unsatisfactory and irrational grounds”.

They said that the ICAC findings “were not made in accordance with law”.

The former MP said she did not read claim forms and rarely read memos outlining rules about expense allowances.

Angela D’Amore also disputed evidence Karen Harbilas gave to the ICAC about her.

In its report to Parliament, the ICAC acknowledged inconsistencies in Karen Harbilas evidence but said that it was more reliable than Angela D’Amore’s.

In the Supreme Court today, Justice Peter McClellan has dismissed her appeal against the ICAC and ordered her to pay costs.

The former MP was not in court for the judgement.

Queensland Labor; Former Labor Minister Nuttall yet to pay Parliament contempt fine

From The ABC Online. May 11, 2012

Disgraced former state government Labor minister Gordon Nuttall is yet to pay a fine imposed for contempt of Queensland’s Parliament as the deadline looms.

Nuttall was jailed in 2009 for receiving corrupt payments from several businessmen while he was a Beattie government minister.

He received a total of $480,000 combined from two businessmen, mining magnate Ken Talbot and barrister Harold Shand, who is also now in jail.

He also got another $141,500 from Brendan McEnnery, another businessmen.

Last year he was brought before Parliament to answer charges that he did not declare those payments on the pecuniary interests register.

It was the first time a prisoner had been hauled before the bar of Parliament and was to give him a chance to explain why he should not be held in contempt.

The House found him guilty and voted to impose an $82,000 fine.

The 12-month deadline expires tomorrow, but Nuttall may be given until the close of business on Monday to pay.

Nuttall told Parliament last year he was in no position to pay the penalty.

ABC reporter Matt Wordsworth spoke to The World Today about the case.

The CMC, the Crime and Misconduct Commission was the one that really drove the investigation and they looked into what Gordon Nuttall owned and he owned a couple of properties and they took out restraining orders so that he couldn’t dispose of them or change their ownership details.

So he obviously got the money from Harold Shand and Ken Talbot of about $480,000, he got the other $141,000 from McEnnery. You add the legal costs that were accrued through all of this – $640,000, and you actually have to pay interest on all of that as well if you’re Gordon Nuttall. So he ended up owing about $700,000.

So they sold one of his properties up at Woodgate and Wide Bay, a lovely little place by the sea for $760,000 last year and so they gave him back the change from that, let him keep his family property at Sandgate.

So he’s still got that house but whether they can go after it is another question given they’d have to be declared, he’d have to be declared bankrupt effectively.

ABC reporter Matt Wordsworth
 The Clerk of Parliament is expected to report to Queensland’s new Legislative Assembly next week.

It would then be up to the Speaker and MPs to decide what course of action to take.

The Parliament would have the power to waive the fine, give Nuttall more time to pay or hold him in jail indefinitely until he pays the money

Labor Federal; Credibility gone, PM should fall on her sword.

From the Canberra Times Online. By Michelle Gratton. April 30, 2012

JULIA Gillard should consider falling on her sword for the good of the Labor Party, because she can no longer present an even slightly credible face at the election. Her spectacular U-turn on everything she’d said before on Craig Thomson and Peter Slipper has left her looking nakedly expedient, and further exposed the state of crisis within the government.

At one point in her news conference Gillard wrung her hands. It was a metaphor for what the caucus is doing. Her claim that suddenly ”a line” had been crossed, so she had to act to preserve Australians’ respect for Parliament, came out as a workshopped confection she could not explain. After months of declaring Thomson had her support, after a week of backing Slipper returning to the Speakership if he was cleared on criminal allegations, she wants us to believe she arrived back from Gallipoli and suddenly realised that the public see a dark cloud over Parliament?

What actually happened is that she and whoever she is listening to observed a storm enveloping the government that could threaten her leadership.

Refusing to utter criticism of Thomson was always defending the indefensible. When Gillard then had Slipper added to her political burden, the weight simply became too heavy.

The Slipper affair tipped the balance, because she wasn’t going to be able to sustain her stand. The opposition and crossbenchers had the parliamentary numbers to keep him out of the chair. In more normal circumstances, Gillard might deserve some credit for doing the right thing, albeit late. But when she said black was white so vehemently and, in the Thomson case, for so long, her cynicism overwhelms any other impression.

While on Slipper she acted because she was cornered, she could not deal with him without distancing herself from Thomson, because the parallels were too close. Bearing down on her also was next week’s budget: hence the need for speed.

Gillard’s belated change of position is made even less convincing because she has not been willing to acknowledge her own past lack of judgment and her trampling of propriety.

Defending Slipper last week, she pointed to what Labor had been able to do with the extra number gained by his defection. But the Slipper deal was always grubby politics.

And when Gillard talks about Australians expecting ”the highest standards”, what are they to make of Anthony Albanese last week pre-empting the police investigation by declaring Slipper cleared of the criminal allegations?

If Labor had any functioning party elders, they would be advising Gillard to consider the good of the party and relinquish the leadership gracefully. That would lead Labor down another fraught path, but it could hardly be worse off than now

Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/opinion/politics/credibility-gone-pm-should-fall-on-her-sword-20120429-1xt3a.html#ixzz1tUYgs3sJ

Federal Labor; Documents reveal more claims against Slipper.

From, The ABC Online. April 23, 2012

House of Representatives Speaker Peter Slipper is accused of using his office to foster sexual relationships with young male staffers, according to documents lodged with the Federal Court and made public today.

Mr Slipper’s staffer James Ashby has lodged a claim under the Fair Work Act against the Commonwealth and against Mr Slipper.

He alleges Mr Slipper made unwelcome sexual advances, comments and suggestions to him while he worked for him and stayed in his Canberra flat.

In documents made public today, Mr Ashby says officials in John Howard’s government knew as far back as 2003 that Mr Slipper – who was then a Liberal MP – “had formed a relationship of a sexual nature with a younger male member of staff” employed in his office.

The documents allege that Tony Nutt, a senior adviser to then-prime minister Mr Howard, was told of the allegations “in or around mid-2003″.

It says a former Slipper staffer, Megan Hobson, had seen a video in which Mr Slipper “was observed to”:

  • …enter the bedroom of a junior staff member through the window;
  • … lie on a bed with the junior male staff member in shorts and T-shirt and hug the junior male staff member in an intimate fashion;
  • … urinate out of the window of the room.
 The documents allege that Mr Nutt then told Ms Hobson to “forget all about it”.

“The Commonwealth thereafter failed to take reasonable and effective steps to prevent the Second Respondent [Mr Slipper] from utilising his office to foster sexual relationships with young male staff members,” the claim alleges.

The court documents also said the staffer in question showed Ms Hobson “scabs on his knuckles where he said he had recently hit a brick wall whilst defending himself against an attack by Peter Slipper during a parliamentary trip to Adelaide”.

Mr Slipper says he “emphatically denies” sexually harassing Mr Ashby.

He has stood aside from his position as Speaker while allegations of the misuse of Cabcharge vouchers are investigated by the Department of Finance.

The court documents lodged today also allege that Mr Ashby saw Mr Slipper sign a number of blank Cabcharge vouchers in January and February this year.

The Government says it is appropriate Mr Slipper stands aside for the Cabcharge investigation but not while the civil case on the sexual claims is dealt with.

This morning, Sydney’s Daily Telegraph published more allegations that Mr Slipper had breached the rules relating to MPs’ travel entitlements, saying he claimed several flights and taxi trips, mostly in 2010, which could be outside parliamentary spending rules.

I still hope we live in a country where people are innocent until proven guilty even if they’re high profile members of Parliament.

Question of confidence

Mr Slipper is yet to respond to the latest allegations but took to Twitter this morning to “thank all those who have offered strong support to [wife] Inge and me at this time”.

His dramatic decision to stand aside will put Labor back on a parliamentary knife-edge when the House of Representatives gathers next month but will not, in itself, be enough to bring down the minority Government.

Key Independent MP Rob Oakeshott says he has an open mind about a potential no confidence motion against the Speaker, but says that is a separate matter to his confidence in the minority Government.

Mr Oakeshott says he believes Mr Slipper should stand aside until the civil matter of alleged of sexual harassment is clarified.

“Between now and when Parliament returns on May 8, I think we will become a lot more clear on … whether they are malicious allegations from a former rogue employee – which happens a lot in politics – or whether there are issues of substance that do leave a case to be answered,” Mr Oakeshott said.

“He’s done the right thing in standing aside. It’s not for me or any member of Parliament to reflect on court proceedings of a criminal or civil nature, or indeed some of the moral questions as salacious and ugly as they might read in weekend newspapers.

“So I acknowledge Peter Slipper has vigorously defied all allegations against him and I would hope this is not trial by media.

“I still hope we live in a country where people are innocent until proven guilty even if they’re high profile members of Parliament.”

Meanwhile, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has defended his party’s decision to repeatedly endorse Mr Slipper as a parliamentary candidate before he quit the Liberals to become Speaker late last year.

Mr Abbott says he had been trying to get Mr Slipper out of the Parliament before he was made Speaker but there were no formal allegations about him when he was a Coalition MP.

“There is a world of difference between a rumour and court action and there was only a formal complaint in the last few days when these court proceedings were launched,” he said.

Labor Federal; Abbott-proof fence around clean-energy funds.

From The Age Online 18th April 2012

THE Gillard government will fireproof its $10 billion green technology fund against an attack from any future Coalition government by forcing Tony Abbott to repeal legislation in order to shut down the flow of money.

Ensuring its clean energy policies are carved in stone even if it loses next year’s election, Labor indicated yesterday that the funding for the Clean Energy Finance Corporation would be ”specifically appropriated” in legislation to be introduced to Parliament next month.

The earmarking of $2 billion each year for five years, starting in 2013-14, was recommended by an expert panel, chaired by Reserve Bank board member Jillian Broadbent, whose report was released yesterday. Treasurer Wayne Swan said the government would be ”accepting all of the recommendations that have been made in this report”.

The Gillard Government is seeking to protect its green energy technology fund.

Any future Abbott government would be forced to repeal the legislation along with the carbon tax, possibly forcing it into a double-dissolution election if the Greens hold the balance of power in the Senate and Labor holds its ground.

The announcement came as government figures showed Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions rose 0.6 per cent to 546 million tonnes during the year to December 2011, though the nation is still on track to meet its Kyoto Protocol target.

The green fund will provide loans and co-investment to clean energy companies in a bid to boost the sector, which Mr Swan said was the victim of ”financial barriers” to investment. The fund was a key demand from the Greens in their climate change negotiations with the government, and is meant to work in concert with the carbon tax and the renewable energy target to transform Australia to a clean energy economy.

Ms Broadbent said the review panel, which included investors Ian Moore and David Paradice, recommended the money be set in legislation because the fund was highly valuable and needed to be protected.

”You want to give it the best chance to have some longevity,” she said. ”I guess if we hadn’t found so much merit in the concept and the workability of the organisation itself, we might not have done it that way.”

Asked if the Coalition’s fierce hostility to the fund influenced the recommendation, she said: ”I think that influenced it. It’s really saying that there’s got to be a conviction that you undo this, rather than treating it lightly.”

Half of the green fund will go towards renewable energy projects such as wind, solar and geothermal, and the other half to low-emissions and energy efficiency measures. Carbon capture and storage is excluded.

Ms Broadbent said the fund would follow stringent commercial criteria but would be akin to an ethical investor, aiming to move Australia towards a low-carbon future.

The government intends the fund to make a profit.

Greens leader Christine Milne said the fund was necessary to deliver the scale of renewables needed to battle climate change.

Opposition climate spokesman Greg Hunt called on the government to keep the lid on any funding until after the next election, given allocations of money would not begin until July 2013 – just weeks before a likely poll.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/abbottproof-fence-around-cleanenergy-funds-20120417-1x5k0.html#ixzz1sN4Y023R

Federal Labor; Key Labor seats given NBN first; Turnbull – ABC News

From the ABC Online, April 5, 2012

The Federal Opposition has accused the Government of using the National Broadband Network (NBN) as a political tool to retain key federal seats in Queensland.

The map of the NBN rollout in Brisbane shows the network will largely be built in Labor’s federal seats over the next three years.

The Government denies the claim, saying the rollout has to begin at the main exchanges – which are mostly in Labor-held seats.

But the Opposition’s communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull says he doubts that explanation.

“It does seem a remarkable coincidence,” Mr Turnbull said.

“If that is the case, why has the rollout almost perfectly followed the boundaries of the federal electorates?

“The reality is Labor is most vulnerable to a big swing in the federal election in Queensland.”

The Government has pointed out that it is also rolling out the NBN in several Coalition seats outside of Brisbane

Federal Labor; Labor MP Albanese and 10 others breach rule on grants

From the Sydney Morning Herald Online, 22 March 2012, by Markus Mannheim

The Infrastructure Minister, Anthony Albanese, approved more than $31 million in grants for his own electorate or against his department’s advice, in breach of government policy.

The federal Auditor-General, Ian McPhee, has named 11 ministers and parliamentary secretaries who defied a policy designed to eliminate pork-barrelling.

His statement, tabled in Parliament yesterday, also shows the Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Jenny Macklin, directly approved 14 grants, worth more than $730,000, when she should have asked the finance minister to oversee the decisions.

The former finance minister Lindsay Tanner established the grant-reporting rules in 2008 after accusations the Coalition rorted the now defunct Regional Partnerships Program.

Under Labor’s policy, lower-house ministers can neither approve grants for projects in their own electorate, nor can they approve funds against their department’s advice. Instead, these decisions are referred to the finance minister.

Mr McPhee’s office audited about 800 grant-related briefs, prepared over 18 months in 2009 and 2010. It found ministers approved 33 projects in their own electorates without telling the finance minister, and 11 grants against the bureaucracy’s advice.

However, Mr McPhee blamed in part the poor quality of public servants’ briefs.

”The most significant issue raised by the audit report … was the fairly widespread shortcomings [of] briefings to ministerial decision-makers.”

Among Mr Albanese’s decisions was approval of $18 million for a bridge over the Einasleigh River in north Queensland. Although his department advised against the grant, cabinet said the area was disaster-prone and the bridge would reduce the risk of a flood isolating the community.

Mr Albanese, the MP for Grayndler in NSW, was also warned against endorsing a $10 million grant for the Brisbane City Council, but he argued that the unspecified project had ”capacity to deliver significant economic stimulus”.

The public accounts committee decided to publish Mr McPhee’s statement yesterday ”in the interests of transparency and accountability”.

The other frontbenchers, current and former, who breached the policy were Tanya Plibersek, Bill Shorten, Mark Arbib, Nick Sherry, Kate Ellis, Laurie Ferguson, Peter Garrett, Tony Burke and Robert McClelland.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/albanese-10-others-breach-rule-on-grants-20120321-1vka7.html#ixzz1pp58Ff3O

Labor W.A. Court dismisses Brian Burke appeal.

From The Herald Sun Online, March 9, 2012.

FORMER West Australian premier Brian Burke has had his appeal against a Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) conviction dismissed.

The WA Appeal Court dismissed the appeal today.

Burke was appealing against his conviction and $25,000 fine in April 2010 for lying to the CCC during the watchdog’s investigation into lobbying of the controversial Smiths Beach development in WA’s southwest.

Four similar charges were dropped against Burke at the time, as well as charges against his co-accused and lobbying partner, Julian Grill, and former ministerial staffer Nathan Hondros.

Burke still faces trial on September 3 over a remaining CCC charge that he and public servant Gary Stokes were involved in the disclosure of official secrets relating to land rezoning in the town of Whitby, southeast of Perth

Rebate for Solar Hot Water axed;

From The Brisbane Times Online, February 29, 2012 byAdam Morton.

A HOUSEHOLD rebate scheme for solar hot water systems has been abruptly axed by the Gillard government, prompting warnings it will cost clean energy manufacturing jobs.

Climate change parliamentary secretary Mark Dreyfus issued a press release at 5pm yesterday announcing the Renewable Energy Bonus Scheme was being shut down.
More than 250,000 households have used the rebate to help replace old  water heaters with solar systems.

The scheme offers a $1000 rebate for a solar hot water system and $600 for a heat pump.

Mr Dreyfus said households must have installed, purchased or ordered and paid a deposit on a system before close of business yesterday to qualify. Rebate applications must be lodged before June 30.

Industry representatives acknowledged they had been warned the scheme would close this year, but had hoped it would be extended after the government allocated it $24.5million in budget forward estimates for 2012-13.

Gareth Jennings, government relations manager with manufacturer Rheem, said losing the rebate would leave the industry in disarray and ‘‘tens of millions of dollars’’ of solar systems sitting in warehouses.

He said the industry had been hurt by the high Australian dollar, which  affected exports and left it struggling to compete with imported gas hot water systems. Up to a third of Rheem’s 1200 staff worked in solar water manufacturing.

‘‘We’ve got to work out what we are going to do with these people tomorrow,’’ he said. ‘‘With this we could see the market halve overnight — we will be back to being a cottage industry. All of that means jobs.’’

Mr Dreyfus said the $320million scheme had helped households cut carbon dioxide emissions and reduce power bills.

Coalition climate action spokesman Greg Hunt said the announcement was a huge blow to the solar industry and would cost jobs.

‘‘They needed to give the industry reasonable notice. Instead it has come to a crashing halt,’’ he said. ‘‘The government simply manages to do enormous damage to the solar sector on a repeated basis.’’

Greens deputy leader Christine Milne said: ‘‘This scheme should have been extended, not cancelled early, particularly not at such ridiculously short notice and with no reason given.’’

Households installing solar hot water can still qualify for a separate incentive payment of  up to $1000 under the small-scale renewable energy scheme.

It is believed the $24.5 million allocated for the axed scheme next financial year is to process outstanding applications and evaluate the success of the program.

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/opinion/political-news/rebate-for-solar-hot-water-axed-20120228-1u140.html#ixzz1njdjFD7W

Labor Federal; Police raid home amid health union fraud probe

From the ABC Online 24, February, 2012.

Police who have been investigating allegations of fraud by senior Health Services Union (HSU) executives have raided a home in Sydney’s north this morning.

Strikeforce Carnarvon was set up last year to look into inappropriate practices at the HSU, after a raft of allegations were made against the union’s head Michael Williamson and former General Secretary Craig Thomson – who is now a federal labor MP.

This morning officers from the Fraud and Cyber Crimes Squad raided a home at Palm Beach as part of that investigation.

Police say they cannot comment further, but it is believed the home that was searched belongs to John Gilleland.

Mr Gilleland has been accused by officials within the HSU of paying for the credit card accounts of Mr Thomson and Mr Williamson in exchange for them giving business to his printing and graphic design company.

Allegations of fraud within the HSU are also being investigated separately by Victorian police and Fairwork Australia